<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: marking criteria December 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://safetyfirst173.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/marking-criteria-december-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://safetyfirst173.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/marking-criteria-december-2008/</link>
	<description>strategies towards minimizing danger in improvisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:13:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: han</title>
		<link>http://safetyfirst173.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/marking-criteria-december-2008/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>han</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safetyfirst173.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Andrea. Some questions to chew over:

&lt;em&gt;we barely touched the issue [of stage presence] in class&lt;/em&gt;

You’ve brought up ‘active listening’—a mechanism by which audience creates meaning based on partial, complex or contradictory stimuli. Is the underlying mechanism by which this (the perception of magic) occurs stage craft?

&lt;em&gt;also because i’m generally more interested in the musical side of a performance, and regard theatrics as a bonus.&lt;/em&gt;

Can we talk about the ‘musical side’ in the absence of theatrics?

&lt;em&gt;i wouldn’t like to have to do something theatrical just for the sake of it&lt;/em&gt;

For the sake of who/what?

&lt;em&gt;but if the situation requires it&lt;/em&gt;

Who/what requires it?

&lt;em&gt;some idea comes up i might come up with something&lt;/em&gt;

Same ol’ question: does the music (or theater) just happen, or do you make it happen?

&lt;em&gt;but generally speaking i thought the ‘rehearsals’ we have done during last class basically sucked.&lt;/em&gt;

Isn’t ‘it sucked’ sometimes a better place to start then ‘that was great’? At least we have something to fix (and improve) rather than reveling in lazy dogmas of good or bad.

See you tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Andrea. Some questions to chew over:</p>
<p><em>we barely touched the issue [of stage presence] in class</em></p>
<p>You’ve brought up ‘active listening’—a mechanism by which audience creates meaning based on partial, complex or contradictory stimuli. Is the underlying mechanism by which this (the perception of magic) occurs stage craft?</p>
<p><em>also because i’m generally more interested in the musical side of a performance, and regard theatrics as a bonus.</em></p>
<p>Can we talk about the ‘musical side’ in the absence of theatrics?</p>
<p><em>i wouldn’t like to have to do something theatrical just for the sake of it</em></p>
<p>For the sake of who/what?</p>
<p><em>but if the situation requires it</em></p>
<p>Who/what requires it?</p>
<p><em>some idea comes up i might come up with something</em></p>
<p>Same ol’ question: does the music (or theater) just happen, or do you make it happen?</p>
<p><em>but generally speaking i thought the ‘rehearsals’ we have done during last class basically sucked.</em></p>
<p>Isn’t ‘it sucked’ sometimes a better place to start then ‘that was great’? At least we have something to fix (and improve) rather than reveling in lazy dogmas of good or bad.</p>
<p>See you tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackmudorchestra</title>
		<link>http://safetyfirst173.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/marking-criteria-december-2008/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>blackmudorchestra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safetyfirst173.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-60</guid>
		<description>seems that these criteria would fit our class better than the 2006 ones, so the adjustments are most welcome. i&#039;m glad that a preference has been given to the strategy/interaction aspect rather than stage presence one. for one reason because we barely touched the issue in class (and in that class we were missing Owen who would definitely have had lots of input), but also because i&#039;m generally more interested in the musical side of a performance, and regard theatrics as a bonus. Looks like what&#039;s sought here is confidence on stage, and i think that&#039;s fair enough.. i wouldn&#039;t like to have to do something theatrical just for the sake of it, but if the situation requires it and some idea comes up i might come up with something.. but generally speaking i thought the &#039;rehearsals&#039; we have done during last class  basically sucked..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems that these criteria would fit our class better than the 2006 ones, so the adjustments are most welcome. i&#8217;m glad that a preference has been given to the strategy/interaction aspect rather than stage presence one. for one reason because we barely touched the issue in class (and in that class we were missing Owen who would definitely have had lots of input), but also because i&#8217;m generally more interested in the musical side of a performance, and regard theatrics as a bonus. Looks like what&#8217;s sought here is confidence on stage, and i think that&#8217;s fair enough.. i wouldn&#8217;t like to have to do something theatrical just for the sake of it, but if the situation requires it and some idea comes up i might come up with something.. but generally speaking i thought the &#8216;rehearsals&#8217; we have done during last class  basically sucked..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
